<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>Daily Kitten Chat Forum Topic: Suprising poll from China</title>
<link>http://www.dailykitten.com/chat/</link>
<description>Daily Kitten Chat Forum Topic: Suprising poll from China</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 20:01:13 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>CheetahBoysmommy on "Suprising poll from China"</title>
<link>http://www.dailykitten.com/chat/topic/22170#post-460812</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>CheetahBoysmommy</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">460812@http://www.dailykitten.com/chat/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Well, why wouldn't sex workers be high on the list when you stop to think about it?  They tell you up front what they are going to do and how much it will cost; they do the job; the relationship is then over.  They don't follow you around asking for extra taxes, they don't bait and switch; if they lie to you it's because you want them to.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;It's not my idea of a great job, and I'm not sure about the morality of it, but it is a pretty cut-and-dried transaction.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sheba's Mom in Raleigh, NC on "Suprising poll from China"</title>
<link>http://www.dailykitten.com/chat/topic/22170#post-460787</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Sheba's Mom in Raleigh, NC</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">460787@http://www.dailykitten.com/chat/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;You can't make this stuff up........Truth is stranger than fiction.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>jeankit on "Suprising poll from China"</title>
<link>http://www.dailykitten.com/chat/topic/22170#post-460781</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>jeankit</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">460781@http://www.dailykitten.com/chat/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;OOPS...So sorry Soxmom...pay attention Jeankit, even while at work!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>SoxsMom on "Suprising poll from China"</title>
<link>http://www.dailykitten.com/chat/topic/22170#post-460778</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>SoxsMom</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">460778@http://www.dailykitten.com/chat/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I'm not Dee.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>jeankit on "Suprising poll from China"</title>
<link>http://www.dailykitten.com/chat/topic/22170#post-460777</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>jeankit</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">460777@http://www.dailykitten.com/chat/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Hmmm, what about Government Officials...? Thanks Dee for this think tank thread!
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>SoxsMom on "Suprising poll from China"</title>
<link>http://www.dailykitten.com/chat/topic/22170#post-460764</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>SoxsMom</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">460764@http://www.dailykitten.com/chat/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;WOULD I LIE TO YOU? Insight China magazine conducted a poll of 3,376&#60;br /&#62;
   Chinese citizens, asking what professions they found to be trustworthy.&#60;br /&#62;
   Farmers came in at number one, followed by religious workers. Number&#60;br /&#62;
   three: prostitutes, followed closely by soldiers. &#34;A list like this is&#60;br /&#62;
   at the same time surprising and embarrassing,&#34; said the state-run China&#60;br /&#62;
   Daily, saying sex workers received &#34;unexpected prominence&#34; on the list.&#60;br /&#62;
   The &#34;least credible category&#34; of workers included real estate&#60;br /&#62;
   developers, secretaries, agents, and entertainers. (BBC) ...The best&#60;br /&#62;
   part: no one found it surprising that hookers are followed closely by&#60;br /&#62;
   soldiers.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

