Proposed law would require pay for sick workers

(5 posts)

http://www.reutershealth.com/archive/2009/11/04/eline/links/20091104elin013.html

Posted 2 years ago by Dee #
Wonder if it will actually pass.

Posted 2 years ago by AZDEBRA 5/27 & crew #
I guess I'm luckier than I've thought because my sick time has always been paid. Every since I started working at 16 years old.

Posted 2 years ago by HuddysMama #
'The emergency law would cover pandemic H1N1 flu or any other infectious disease'

I can understand both sides of this issue. On one hand, I'd feel sorry for the small business owner who might already be struggling to pay the one person w/is working. And, I think a lot of workers would take advantage of this. Would it cover a cold, too? But, if there's a requirement that one has a doctor's note, maybe that person doesn't have health insurance and can't afford to go to the doctor? On the other hand, I don't want to be around sick people and I'd love for them to stay home. This includes sick kids who are sent to school just because their parents don't have child care. I can definitely understand the dilemma on this. All I can say is, "Wow!". I'd hate to have to decide on this one.

Posted 2 years ago by FondaHonda #
I agree FH! I see both sides too, but I believe this is one of the more wise pieces of legislation in a long time. It's purpose is to keep a lid on H1N1 and other public health risks. I too am lucky and have sick pay.

Posted 2 years ago by 2bpurring #

Reply

You must log in to post.